The American Voice Institute of Public Policy

House of Representatives — 109th Congress 2006

(2nd Session)

Click here to go to U.S. Senate — 109th Congress, 2nd Session

To read how On the Record was developed, click here.

Alabama

Alaska

Arizona

Arkansas

California

Colorado

Connecticut

Delaware

Florida

Georgia

Hawaii

Idaho

Illinois

Indiana

Iowa

Kansas

Kentucky

Louisiana

Maine

Maryland

Massachusetts

Michigan

Minnesota

Mississippi

Missouri

Montana

Nebraska

Nevada

New Hampshire

New Jersey

New Mexico

New York

North Carolina

North Dakota

Ohio

Oklahoma

Oregon

Pennsylvania

Rhode Island

South Carolina

South Dakota

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Vermont

Virginia

Washington

West Virginia

Wisconsin

Wyoming

Description of the bills

1. 516. (Roll Call Vote) HR 4954 Port Security/Conference Report.  

Adoption of the conference report on the bill that would authorize a total of $2 billion over five years for the port security grant program.  Adopted (thus sent to the Senate) 409-2.   September 30, 2006 (in the session that began in the Congressional Record dated September 29, 2006). The American Voice Institute supported this bill.

2. 511. (Roll Call Vote) HR 4772.  Eminent Domain/Passage.

Passage of the bill that would ensure access to federal courts for those who are challenging government attempts to take their property under eminent domain.  It would allow private landowners who want to challenge a state or local government's “taking” of their land to file a claim directly with a federal court when only federal claims are alleged.  Passed 231 – 181.  September 29, 2006.  The American Voice Institute supported this bill.

3. 508. (Roll Call Vote) S 3930.  Military Tribunals/Passage. 

Passage of the bill that would authorize military tribunals to try detainees designated as “alien unlawful enemy combatants.” Cases in which the accused is found guilty would be reviewed by a new Court of Military Commission Review.  The bill would bar habeas corpus appeals for detainees retroactive to September 11, 2001.  The bill would bar the   use of evidence obtained through torture; it would allow the use of some coerced testimony and evidence seized without a warrant.  Classified evidence would not be disclosed if it would be detrimental to national security.  Past (thus cleared for the President ) 250 – 170.  A “yea” was a vote in support of the President's position.  September 29, 2006. The American Voice Institute supported this bill.

4. 502. (Roll Call Vote) Warrantless Electronic Surveillance/ Passage.   

Passage of the bill that would authorize electronic surveillance of communication by suspected terrorists for specified periods without first obtaining approval from the secret FISA court.  Warrantless surveillance could be conducted for up to 90 days if an armed or terrorist attack against the United States has occurred, or if there is an “imminent threat.” The President would have to notify congressional Intelligence committees and the FISA court of such surveillance.  Passed 232 – 191.  A “yea” was a vote in support of the President's position.  September 28, 2006. The American Voice Institute supported this bill.

5. 479.  (Role Call Vote) S 403.  Parental Notification/Passage.

Passage of the bill that would make it a federal crime to take a minor across state lines to obtain an abortion in order to circumvent state parental notification and consent laws. It would provide an exception when an abortion is necessary to save the life of the minor. Physicians who perform an abortion on an out-of- state minor would have to provide at least 24 hours' notice to the minor's parents. Passed 264 – 153. A “yea” was a vote in support of the President's position. September 26, 2006. The American Voice Institute supported this bill.

6. 469. (Roll Call Vote) HR 4830.  Border Tunnel/Passage.

Passage of the bill that would establish new criminal penalties for individuals involved in the construction of illegal tunnels across the US border.  Individuals convicted of using such tunnels to smuggle illegal immigrants, controlled substances, weapons of mass destruction or other illegal goods would be subject to twice the criminal penalty that they otherwise would face.  Passed 422 – 0.  September 21, 2006. The American Voice Institute supported this bill.

7. 468. (Roll Call Vote) HR 6095.  Immigration Law Enforcement/Passage.

Passage of the bill that would set new procedures to expedite lawsuits against the government involving immigration law, require the Justice Department to hire more attorneys to prosecute human smuggling cases, and clarify that the state and local law enforcement agencies have the authority to investigate and apprehend  illegal legal immigrants.  Past 277 – 140.  September 21, 2006. The American Voice Institute supported this bill.

8. 465. (Roll Call Vote) HR 6094. Illegal Immigration Detainment/Passage.

Passage of the bill that would set conditions under which illegal immigrants could be detained indefinitely pending their deportation, bar admission into the United States of gang members and allow alien members of certain gangs to be automatically eligible for deportation.  Passed 328 – 95.   September 21, 2006.  The American Voice Institute supported this bill. The American Voice Institute supported this bill.

9. 459.  (Roll Call Vote) HR 4844.  Voter Identification/ Passage. 

Passage of the bill that would require individuals voting in a federal election to provide photo ID, and in fiscal 2010, to provide photo identification that also shows proof of citizenship in order to vote.  Voters who cannot show identification could cast provisional ballots, which could be counted only if the voter presented photo identification to an election official within 48 hours.  States would be required to provide photographic voter ID cards to voters who do not have other forms of government – issued identification.  Passed 228 – 196.  September 20, 2006. The American Voice Institute supported this bill.

10. 446.  (Roll Call Vote) HR 6061.  Border Fencing/Passage.

Passage of the bill that would authorize the construction of about 700 miles of fencing along the US-Mexico border. The bill would require a study of implementing security systems along the US-Canadian border and direct the agency to the evaluate the ability of personnel to stop fleeing vehicles at the border. Passed 283 – 138. September 14, 2006. The American Voice Institute supported this bill.

11. 525. (Roll Call Vote) HR 5970 – Tax Package/Passage.

Passage of the bill that would raise the minimum wage to $7.25 per hour by June 1, 2009.  It would increase the amount of an estate that is exempt from tax, index the amount for inflation, and reduce the tax rate on the portion of the inheritance that exceeds the exemption.  The bill also would extend through 2007 a group of expiring tax breaks, including the research and development credit, the tuition tax deduction for higher education and the deduction for state and local sales taxes.  Passed 230 – 180.  July 29, 2006 (in the session that began, and the Congressional Record dated, July 28, 2006). The American Voice Institute supported this bill.

12. 405. (Roll Call Vote) HR 5319.  Internet Safety/Passage.

Upton, R-Michigan, motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill that would require schools and libraries applying for grants through the Universal Service Fund to certify that they are enforcing a policy of Internet safety for minors, including protecting their computers against access to visual depictions that are obscene, contain child pornography or are harmful to minors.  Motion agreed to 410 – 15.  A two-thirds majority of those present and voting (284 in this case) is required for passage under suspension of the rules.  July 26, 2006. The American Voice Institute supported this bill.

13. 391. (Roll Call Vote) H Res 921 Condemnation of the Recent Attacks Against Israel/Adoption.

Hyde, R-Illinois, motion to suspend the rules and adopt a resolution that would reaffirm the support of the House of Representatives for the state of Israel, and condemn Hamas and Hezbollah for unprovoked attacks against Israel.  Motion agreed to 410 – 8.  A two-thirds majority of those present and voting (279 in this case) is required for adoption under suspension of the rules.  July 20, 2006.  The American Voice Institute supported this resolution.

14. 388. (Roll Call Vote) HR 810. Embryonic Stem Cell Research,/Veto Override.

Passage, over President Bush's July 19, 2006, veto, of the bill that would allow the use of federal funds in research on embryonic stem cell lines derive from surplus embryos that at in-vitro fertilization clinics, but only if donors give their consent and are not paid for the embryos.  The bill would authorize the Health and Human Services Department   to conduct and support research involving human embryonic stem cells that meet certain criteria, regardless of when stem cells were derived from a human embryo.  Rejected 235 – 193.  A two– thirds majority of those present and voting (286 in this case) are both chambers is required to override a veto.  A “nay” was a vote in support of the President's position.  July 19, 2006. The American Voice Institute did not support this bill.

15. 386.  (Roll Call Vote) HR5683.   Soledad Veterans Memorial/Passage.

Hunter, R-California, Motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill that would authorize the federal acquisition of the Mount Soledad Veterans Memorial in San Diego, California.  Motion agreed to 349-74.  A two-thirds majority of those present and voting (282 in this case) is required for passage under suspension of the rules.  A “yea” was a vote in support of the President's position.  July 19, 2006. The American Voice Institute supported this bill.

16. 385. (Roll Call Vote) HR 2389.  Pledge of Allegiance/ Passage. 

Passage of the bill that would prohibit federal district and appellate courts and the Supreme Court from hearing cases challenging the constitutionality of the Pledge of Allegiance. It would allow the Superior Court of the District of Columbia and the District of Columbia Court of Appeals to continue hearing such cases. Passed 260 – 167.  July 19, 2006. The American Voice Institute supported this bill.

17. 379. (Roll Call Vote) S 3504. Fetal Harvesting Ban/Passage.

Barton, R-Texas, motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill that would prohibit the solicitation or knowing acceptance of tissue from human fetuses deliberately gestated for research purposes. Motion agreed to 425 – 0.  A two-thirds majority of those present and voting (284 in this case) is required for passage under suspension of the rules.  A “yea” was a vote in support of the President's position.  July 18, 2006. The American Voice Institute supported this bill.

18. 356. (Roll Call Vote) HR 4761. Offshore Drilling/Passage.

Passage of the bill that would end a federal moratorium on most offshore exploration and development of oil and national natural gas but give states more control over drilling along their coast.  The bill would require the Interior Department to offer leases for offshore oil and gas drilling for 75 percent of available offshore locations on the Outer Continental Shelf.  Drilling would be banned out to 50 miles off the coast.  States could repeal the ban and pursue exploration closer to the coast or extend protection to 100 miles.  Passed 232 – 187.  June 29, 2006. The American Voice Institute supported this bill.

19. 315. (Roll Call Vote) HR 5638 Estate Tax Reduction/ Passage.

Passage of the bill that would reduce the estate tax, providing an exemption of $5 million for individuals and $10 million for couples, effective in 2010 and indexed for inflation.  Beginning in 2010 the estate tax rate would be equal to that on capital gains for estates up to $25, million and twice that for estates valued at $25 million or more.  The bill also would provide a 60 percent deduction in capital gains from qualified timber sales.  Passed 269 – 156.  June 22, 2006. The American Voice Institute supported this bill.

20. 253. (Roll Call Vote)  H Res 608. Religious Persecution in China/Adoption.

Smith, R-New Jersey, motion to suspend the rules and adopt a resolution that would condemn the imprisonment of religious leaders and people of faith in Communist China, urge that they be released, and expressed the sense of the House that the United States should promote and defend religious freedom in  Communist China. Motion agreed to 363 –1. A two-thirds majority of those present and voting (243 in this case) is required for passage under suspension of the rules. June 12, 2006. The American Voice Institute supported this resolution.

21. 209. (Roll Call Vote)  HR 5429.  Arctic National Wildlife Refuge/Passage.

Passage of the bill that would authorize the Interior Department to grant leases for oil and gas exploration, development and production in the coastal plain of Alaska's  Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). A 1987 environmental impact statement would be sufficient for the Interior Department to began sales, which could start within 22 months of enactment. Half of the revenues will be paid to  Alaska and half would go to the Federal government.  Oil pumped from ANWAR could not be exported. Passed 225– 201. A “yea” was a vote in support of the President's position.  May 24, 2006. The American Voice Institute supported this bill.

22. 181 (Roll Call Vote) HR 4681.  Palestinian Aid Restriction/Passage.

Ros-Lehtinen, R-Florida, motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill that would restrict most aid to the Palestinian Authority as long as it is controlled by organizations that have ties to terrorism and failed to recognize Israel's right to exist.  Motion agreed to 361 – 37.  A two-thirds majority of those present and voting (266 in this case) is required for passage under suspension of the rules. May 23, 2006. The American Voice Institute supported this bill.

23. 661 (Roll Call Vote) HR 4437. Border Security/Passage.

Passage of the bill that would tighten border security and increase enforcement of immigration laws.  It would designate unlawful presence, in addition to illegal migration, as a criminal, rather than a civil offense.  It also would increase penalties for a variety of immigration – related crimes.  It would create a mandatory program under which all employers would have to verify employees' work eligibility with the federal government.  As amended, it would require the construction of security fencing, including lights and cameras, along certain ports of entry along the US- Mexico border.  Passed 239 – 182.  A “yea” was a vote in support of the President's position.  December 16, 2005.  The American Voice Institute supported this bill.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Congressional Record

Legend

+ American Voice Institute of Public Policy Supported
-- American Voice Institute of Public Policy Opposed
AF Announced For
AA Announced Against
? Did Not Vote or Otherwise Make a Position Known
P Voted "Present"
V Vacant

Colors Identified

Red Democrats
Blue Republicans
Black Independents

 

ALABAMA

7 Representatives

ALABAMA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Bonner
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
2 Everett
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
3 Rogers
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
4 Aderholt
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
5 Cramer
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
91%
6 Bachus
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
AF
+
+
+
100%
7 Davis
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
70%

Back to the Top

ALASKA

Representative-at-Large

ALASKA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
 
Young
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
?
83%

Back to the Top

ARIZONA

4 Representatives

ARIZONA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Renzi
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
2 Franks
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
3 Shadegg
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
4 Pastor
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
35%
5 Hayworth
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
96%
6 Flake
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
83%
7 Grijalva
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
22%
8. Kolbe
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
-
?
74%

Back to the Top

ARKANSAS

4 Representatives

ARKANSAS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Berry
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
87%
2 Snyder
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
?
?
?
-
48%
3 Boozman
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
4 Ross
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
87%

Back to the Top

CALIFORNIA

52 Representatives

CALIFORNIA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Thompson
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
48%
2 Herger
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
3 Lungren
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
4 Doolittle
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
?
+
96%
5 Matsui, D.
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
AF
-
+
-
30%
6 Woolsey
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
26%
7 Miller, George
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
26%
8 Pelosi
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
P
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
35%
9 Lee
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
22%
10 Tauscher
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
39%
11 Pombo
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
AF
+
100%
12 Lantos
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
39%
13 Stark
?
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
?
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
22%
14 Eshoo
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
?
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
30%
15 Honda
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
26%
16 Lofgren
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
26%
17 Farr
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
30%
18 Cardoza
+
+
-
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
?
+
+
-
65%
19 Radanovich
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
96%
20 Costa
+
+
-
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
-
74%
21 Nunes
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
96%
22 Thomas
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
91%
23 Capps
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
26%
24 Gallegly
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
AF
+
+
+
100%
25 McKeon
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
26 Dreier
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
27 Sherman
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
30%
28 Berman
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
35%
29 Schiff
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
35%
30 Waxman
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
30%
31 Becerra
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
26%
32 Solis
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
30%
33 Watson
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
?
-
P
-
26%
34 Roybal-Allard
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
?
-
+
-
35%
35 Waters
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
P
-
-
-
+
-
?
?
-
+
-
35%
36 Harman
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
39%
37 Millender-McDonald
+
-
-
-
?
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
?
-
+
-
35%
38 Napolitano
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
?
?
39%
39 S á nchez, Linda
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
AF
-
+
-
30%
40 Royce
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
41 Lewis
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
42 Miller, Gary
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
100%
43 Baca
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
?
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
48%
44 Calvert
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
96%
45 Bono
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
91%
46 Rohrabacher
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
91%
47 S á nchez, Loretta
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
?
-
-
-
+
-
-
AF
-
+
-
35%
48 Campbell
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
96%
49 Issa
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
96%
50Vacant (Bilbray ) *
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
V
V
V
V
96%
51 Filner
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
39%
52 Hunter
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
100%
53 Davis
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
35%

*Brian Phillip Bilbray won a special election to serve out the remaining seven months of the term of Randy Cunningham.

Back to the Top

COLORADO

6 Representatives

COLORADO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 DeGette
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
30%
2 Udall
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
+
48%
3 Salazar
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
-
?
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
74%
4 Musgrav
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
100%
5 Hefley
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
6 Tancredo
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
7 Beauprez
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%

Back to the Top

CONNECTICUT

6 Representatives

CONNECTICUT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Larson
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
AF
-
39%
2 Simmons
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
83%
3 DeLauro
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
?
-
+
-
35%
4 Shays
+
-
+
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
AF
AF
-
+
+
70%
5 Johnson
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
78%

Back to the Top

DELAWARE

Representative-at-Large

DELAWARE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Castle
?
?
?
?
AA
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
87%

Back to the Top

FLORIDA

23 Representatives

FLORIDA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Miller, J.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
2 Boyd
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
83%
3 Brown
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
?
-
?
-
44%
4 Crenshaw
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
5 Brown-Waite
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
6 Stearns
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
7 Mica
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
8 Keller
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
AF
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
9 Bilirakis
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
AF
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
10 Young
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
100%
11 Davis
+
-
-
-
?
+
+
+
-
?
-
+
?
-
+
-
?
-
?
?
-
?
-
57%
12 Putnam
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
13 Harris
+
+
+
+
+
?
?
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
96%
14 Mack
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
83%
15 Weldon
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
16 Foley*
?
?
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
91%
17 Meek
+
?
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
?
-
+
-
39%
18 Ros-Lehtinen
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
78%
19 Wexler
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
?
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
?
-
+
-
35%
20 Wasserman-Schultz
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
30%
21 Diaz-Balart, L.
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
83%
22 Shaw
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
91%
23 Hastings
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
35%
24 Feeney
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
25 Diaz-Balart, M.
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
AA
87%

*Representative Mark Foley, Republican-Florida, resigned effective September 30, 2006 (at the end of the legislative session that began September 29, 2006). The last vote for which he was eligible was vote 516.

Back to the Top

GEORGIA

11 Representatives

GEORGIA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Kingston
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
2 Bishop
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
78%
3 Marshall
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
+
91%
4 McKinney
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
-
-
+
-
-
-
44%
5 Lewis
?
AA
AA
?
?
+
-
-
-
-
?
+
+
?
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
?
-
57%
6 Price
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
7 Linder
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
8 Westmoreland
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
9 Norwood
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
10 Deal
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
100%
11 Gingrey
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
100%
12 Barrow
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
87%
13 Scott
+
+
+
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
57%

Back to the Top

HAWAII

2 Representatives

HAWAII
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Abercrombie
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
44%
2 Case
?
?
?
-
+
?
?
?
?
?
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
?
-
+
+
78%

Back to the Top

IDAHO

2 Representatives

IDAHO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Otter
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
2 Simpson
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%

Back to the Top

ILLINOIS

20 Representatives

ILLINOIS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Rush
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
?
-
?
-
P
-
44%
2 Jackson
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
P
-
30%
3 Lipinski
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
+
65%
4 Gutierrez
?
-
-
?
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
AF
AA
AA
+
-
-
?
-
P
-
48%
5 Emanuel
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
30%
6 Hyde
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
100%
7 Davis
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
?
-
-
?
-
P
-
30%
8 Bean
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
74%
9 Schakowsky
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
26%
10 Kirk
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
78%
11 Weller
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
12 Costello
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
65%
13 Biggert
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
83%
14 Hastert*
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
15 Johnson
AF
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
AF
-
+
+
87%
16 Manzullo
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
100%
17 Evans
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
-
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
-
91%
18 LaHood
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
?
91%
20 Shimkus
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
*The Speaker of the House routinely does not vote.

Back to the Top

INDIANA

10 Representatives

INDIANA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Visclosky
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
+
48%
2 Chocola
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
3 Souder
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
96%
4 Buyer
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
5 Burton
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
6 Pence
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
7 Carson
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
P
-
35%
8 Hostettler
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
91%
9 Sodrel
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%

Back to the Top

IOWA

5 Representatives

IOWA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1Nussle
?
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
100%
2 Leach
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
70%
3 Boswell
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
87%
4 Latham
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
5 King
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%

Back to the Top

KANSAS

4 Representatives

KANSAS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Moran
+
+
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
91%
2 Ryun
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
3 Moore
+
-
+
-
-
?
?
?
?
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
+
61%
4 Tiahrt
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
91%

Back to the Top

KENTUCKY

6 Representatives

KENTUCKY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Whitfield
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
2 Lewis
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
3 Northrup
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
?
?
?
?
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
4 Davis
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
AF
+
+
+
100%
5 Rogers
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
6 Chandler
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
74%

Back to the Top

LOUISIANA

7 Representatives

LOUISIANA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Jindal
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
2 Jefferson
+
+
-
-
?
+
-
+
-
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
65%
3 Melancon
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
87%
4 McCrery
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
100%
5 Alexander
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
6 Baker
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
7 Boustany
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%

Back to the Top

MAINE

2 Representatives

MAINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Allen
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
39%
2 Michaud
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
39%

Back to the Top

MARYLAND

8 Representatives

MARYLAND
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Gilchrest
+
-
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
-
+
65%
2 Ruppersberger
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
AF
-
48%
3 Cardin
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
35%
4 Wynn
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
44%
5 Hoyer
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
35%
6 Bartlett
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
83%
7 Cummings
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
35%
8 Van Hollen
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
30%

Back to the Top

MASSACHUSETTS

10 Representatives

MASSACHUSETTS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Olver
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
30%
2 Neal
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
30%
3 McGovern
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
30%
4 Frank
?
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
35%
5 Meehan
?
?
?
?
?
+
-
?
-
-
?
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
57%
6 Tierney
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
39%
7 Markey
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
26%
8 Capuano
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
?
-
-
-
35%
9 Lynch
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
44%
10 Delahunt
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
39%

Back to the Top

MICHIGAN

16 Representatives

MICHIGAN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Stupak
+
-
-
?
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
61%
2 Hoekstra
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
3 Ehlers
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
87%
4 Camp
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
100%
5 Kildee
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
52%
6 Upton
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
7 Schwarz
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
?
-
+
+
87%
8 Rogers
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
9 Knollenburg
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
10 Miller
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
100%
11 McCotter
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
12 Levin
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
35%
13 Kilpatrick
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
26%
14 Conyers
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
17%
15 Dingell
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
26%

Back to the Top

MINNESOTA

8 Representatives

MINNESOTA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Gutknecht
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
2 Kline
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
3 Ramstad
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
87%
4 McCollum
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
26%
5 Sabo
?
?
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
39%
6 Kennedy
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
96%
7 Peterson
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
100%
8 Oberstar
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
48%

Back to the Top

MISSISSIPPI

5 Representatives

MISSISSIPPI
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Wicker
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
100%
2 Thompson
+
+
?
-
-
?
?
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
65%
3 Pickering
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
100%
4 Taylor
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
91%

Back to the Top

MISSOURI

9 Representatives

MISSOURI
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Clay
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
+
?
-
P
-
39%
2 Akin
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
3 Carnahan
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
44%
4 Skelton
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
74%
5 Cleaver
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
?
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
39%
6 Graves
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
7 Blunt
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
100%
8 Emerson
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
9 Hulshof
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%

Back to the Top

MONTANA

Representative-at-Large

M0NTANA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Rehberg
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
100%

Back to the Top

NEBRASKA

3 Representatives

NEBRASKA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Fotenberry
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
AF
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
2 Terry
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
3 Osborne
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%

Back to the Top

NEVADA

2 Representatives

NEVADA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Berkely
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
?
AF
-
+
-
48%
2 Gibbons
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
AF
+
AF
+
96%
3 Porter
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%

Back to the Top

NEW HAMPSHIRE

2 Representatives

NEW HAMPSHIRE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Bradley
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
78%
2 Bass
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
74%

Back to the Top

NEW JERSEY

13 Representatives

NEW JERSEY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Andrews
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
44%
2 LoBiondo
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
87%
3 Saxton
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
87%
4 Smith
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
87%
5 Garrett
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
91%
6 Pallone
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
30%
7 Ferguson
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
87%
8 Pascrell
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
44%
9 Rothman
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
AF
-
-
+
-
+
-
35%
10 Payne
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
?
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
?
-
P
-
30%
11 Frelinghuysen
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
83%
12 Holt
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
30%
13 Vacant (Menendez)*
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
-
96%

*Robert Menendez was appointed in January 2006, by New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine to fill the seat made vacant by Corzine's resignation from the Senate to serve as Governor of New Jersey.

Back to the Top

NEW MEXICO

3 Representatives

NEW MEXICO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Wilson
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
87%
2 Pearce
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
96%
3 Udall
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
30%

Back to the Top

NEW YORK

31 Representatives

NEW YORK
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Bishop
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
48%
2 Israel
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
39%
3 King
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
4 McCarthy
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
AA
48%
5 Ackerman
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
?
-
+
-
30%
6 Meeks
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
35%
7 Crowley
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
30%
8 Nadler
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
30%
9 Weiner
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
39%
10 Towns
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
44%
11 Owens
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
35%
12 Velázquez
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
26%
13 Fossella
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
14 Maloney
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
39%
15 Rangel
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
30%
16 Serrano
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
?
+
-
+
-
30%
17 Engel
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
P
-
+
-
-
?
-
+
-
35%
18 Lowey
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
30%
19 Kelly
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
83%
20 Sweeney
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
96%
21 McNulty
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
48%
22 Hinchey
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
?
-
-
-
22%
23 McHugh
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
24 Boehlert
+
-
+
+
-
?
?
+
+
+
?
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
78%
25 Walsh
+
-
+
+
+
?
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
91%
26 Reynolds
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
27 Higgins
+
-
+
-
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
AF
+
52%
28 Slaughter
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
35%
29 Kuhl
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%

Back to the Top

NORTH CAROLINA

12 Representatives

NORTH CAROLINA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Butterfield
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
44%
2 Etheridge
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
65%
3 Jones
?
AF
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
87%
4 Price
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
26%
5 Fox
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
6 Coble
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
96%
7 McIntyre
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
83%
8 Hayes
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
9 Myrick
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
10 McHenry
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
96%
11 Taylor
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
100%
12 Watt
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
26%
13 Miller
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
48%

Back to the Top

NORTH DAKOTA

Representative-at-Large

NORTH DAKOTA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Pomeroy
+
?
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
70%

Back to the Top

OHIO

19 Representatives

OHIO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Chabot
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
100%
2 Schmidt
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
3 Turner
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
96%
4 Oxley
?
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
AF
+
+
+
100%
5 Gillmor
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
100%
6 Strickland
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
?
-
+
+
78%
7 Hobson
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
96%
8 Boehner
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
96%
9 Kaptur
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
P
-
+
P
+
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
52%
10 Kucinich
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
P
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
22%
11 Jones
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
35%
12 Tiberi
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
96%
13 Brown
+
-
+
-
?
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
?
-
+
-
61%
14 LaTourette
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
91%
15 Pryce
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
AF
+
+
+
96%
16 Regula
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
91%
17 Ryan
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
57%
18 Ney
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%

Back to the Top

OKLAHOMA

6 Representatives

OKLAHOMA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Sullivan
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
2 Boren
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
91%
3Lucas
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
4 Cole
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
AF
100%
5 Istook
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
?
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
?
?
100%

Back to the Top

OREGON

5 Representatives

OREGON
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Wu
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
48%
2 Walden
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
3 Blumenauer
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
26%
4 DeFazio
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
-
+
52%
5 Hooley
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
48%

Back to the Top

PENNSYLVANIA

21 Representatives

PENNSYLVANIA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Brady
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
?
+
+
-
44%
2 Fattah
+
-
?
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
39%
3 English
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
4 Hart
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
5 Peterson
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
?
+
100%
6 Gerlach
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
?
+
+
-
+
+
87%
7 Weldon
+
-
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
87%
8 Fitzpatrick
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
-
+
+
91%
9 Shuster, Bill
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
10 Sherwood
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
100%
11 Kanjorski
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
?
-
+
+
+
+
61%
12 Murtha
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
57%
13 Schwartz
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
39%
14 Doyle
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
44%
15 Dent
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
16 Pitts
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
100%
17 Holden
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
78%
18 Murphy
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
19 Platts
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
91%

Back to the Top

RHODE ISLAND

2 Representatives

RHODE ISLAND
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Kennedy
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
?
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
?
-
-
+
?
?
-
44%
2 Langevin
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
44%

Back to the Top

SOUTH CAROLINA

6 Representatives

SOUTH CAROLINA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Brown
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
2 Wilson
?
?
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
?
+
+
100%
3 Barrett
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
AF
96%
4 Inglis
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
87%
5 Spratt
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
61%
6 Clyburn
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
39%

Back to the Top

SOUTH DAKOTA

Representative-at-Large

SOUTH DAKOTA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Herseth
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
83%

Back to the Top

TENNESSEE

9 Representatives

TENNESSEE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Jenkins
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
?
+
100%
2 Duncan
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
3 Wamp
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
4 Davis
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
96%
5 Cooper
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
52%
6 Gordon
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
83%
7 Blackburn
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
8 Tanner
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
87%
9 Ford
?
?
+
+
?
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
?
+
?
-
?
+
87%

Back to the Top

TEXAS

30 Representatives

TEXAS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Gohmert
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
2 Poe
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
100%
3 Johnson, Sam
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
?
+
+
+
+
100%
4 Hall, R.
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
5 Hensarling
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
6 Barton
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
AF
+
+
AF
91%
7 Culberson
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
8 Brady
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
9 Green A.
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
48%
10 McCaul
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
11 Conway
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
12 Granger
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
13 Thornberry
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
91%
14 Paul
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
70%
15 Hinojosa
+
+
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
65%
16 Reyes
+
+
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
57%
17 Edwards
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
91%
18 Jackson-Lee
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
39%
19 Neugebauer
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
20 Gonzalez
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
44%
21 Smith
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
22 Vacant (DeLay*)
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
?
+
+
100%
23 Bonilla
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
24 Marchant
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
25 Doggett
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
35%
26 Burgess
+
?
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
27 Ortiz
+
+
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
57%
28 Cuellar
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
-
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
78%
29 Green, G.
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
+
+
AF
-
+
+
+
-
52%
30 Johnson, E.
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
P
-
44%
31 Carter
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
AF
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
32 Sessions
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
100%

*Representative Tom DeLay; R-Texas, resigned effective June 9, 2006. The last vote for which he was eligible was vote 250.

Back to the Top

UTAH

3 Representatives

UTAH
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Bishop
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
?
+
+
+
100%
2 Matheson
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
87%
3 Cannon
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
+
+
+
+
100%

Back to the Top

VERMONT

Representative-at-Large

VERMONT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Sanders
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
39%

Back to the Top

VIRGINIA

11 Representatives

VIRGINIA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Davis, Jo Ann
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
?
?
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
AF
96%
2 Drake
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
3 Scott
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
26%
4 Forbes
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
AF
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
5 Goode
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
6 Goodlatte
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
7 Cantor
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
8 Moran
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
?
-
-
-
44%
9 Boucher
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
65%
10 Wolf
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
11 Davis, T.
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
87%

Back to the Top

WASHINGTON

9 Representatives

WASHINGTON
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Inslee
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
?
?
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
44%
2 Larsen
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
48%
3 Baird
+
-
-
-
-
+
+
+
-
+
P
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
?
-
+
-
57%
4 Hastings
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
96%
5 McMorris
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
6 Dicks
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
?
-
+
-
+
-
44%
7 McDermott
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
17%
8 Reichert
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
+
+
83%
9 Smith
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
44%

Back to the Top

WEST VIRGINIA

3 Representatives

WEST VIRGINIA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Mollohan
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
-
78%
2 Capito
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
?
+
-
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
96%
3 Rahall
+
+
-
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
-
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
-
-
-
65%

Back to the Top

WISCONSIN

9 Representatives

WISCONSIN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Ryan
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%
2 Baldwin
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
-
-
+
-
-
+
-
+
-
30%
3 Kind
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
+
-
+
-
+
+
-
P
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
48%
4 Moore
+
-
-
-
-
+
-
-
-
-
-
+
+
-
+
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
30%
5 Sensenbrenner
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
96%
6 Petri
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
-
+
+
96%
7 Obey
+
-
-
-
+
+
+
+
-
-
-
+
+
-
P
-
+
-
-
+
-
-
-
44%
8 Green
+
+
+
+
AF
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
AF
+
+
+
100%

Back to the Top

WYOMING

Representative-at-Large

WYOMING
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
1 Cubin
+
+
+
+
+
?
?
?
?
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
100%

Back to the Top