About Us

Contact Information

How You Can Make a Difference


Legislative Action Center


Policy Information Center


Religious Liberty

Send Me
More Information




From the President's Desk...

Senator Daschle Should Apologize To The American People
For Politicizing America's National Security

Democratic Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle was frustrated by former Vice President Al Gore's attempt to regain the politically spotlight as the leader of the Democratic party when Gore criticized President Bush's efforts on the war on terrorism and the threatened attack on Iraq during a speech before the Commonwealth Club in San Francisco on Monday, September 23, 2002. To compete with this message and to try to show a leadership stance, Daschle wrongly lashed out and accused President Bush of politicizing the debate over war with Iraq on September 25, 2002. The response by the Majority leader was triggered by a Washington Post story on September 25, that noted that in the past two days, the President had suggested four times that Democrats who control the Senate did not care about national security. At first the White House believed that there had been an honest mistake on behalf of the Senator and felt when he realized what context the statement was made by the President, he would recant his earlier statements.  However, later in the afternoon, the Majority leader reaffirmed his defiance and said on the floor of the Senate, "What context is there, that legitimizes an accusation of that kind I don't care if your talking about Homeland Security, I don't think you can talk about Iraq, you can't talk about war, you can't talk about any context and justify a political comment like that."

The response of Senator Daschle as well as several of his colleagues cannot be justified because the President was right when he said at a political appearance in New Jersey on September 23, 2002:, "The Senate is more interested in special interest in Washington and is not interested in Security of the American people.  I will not except a Department of Homeland Security that does not allow this President and future Presidents to better keep the American people secure."  It was the Senate not the President that has put unions and workers’ rights ahead of American lives and national security when it compromised the Homeland Security bill, stripping the President of the flexibility required to combat terrorism.  The President would have less national security authority in the Department of Homeland Security than he has currently in any other department and agency in the federal government under the so-called Chafee, Breaux, Nelson compromise.

Senator Daschle has tried and failed to refocus the nation on domestic issues such as blaming the current economic downturn on President Bush.  But what he fails to realize  as he tries to advance his own political career and starts his run for the White House is that he makes the nation even more vulnerable to future terrorists.  Tragically, the Democratic Party as a whole is not unified on the war with Iraq.  They, as well as others,  are convinced that the war on terror and Iraq is only to get Republicans elected.  Yet it has been the Republican's lead by the President, who has been advancing ideas to best diminish America’s vulnerability to terrorist attack such as removing Iraqi President Saddam Hussein from power.

Many Democrats, as well as a few Republicans, put the national security of this nation at risk because they do not take the war on terrorism seriously.  One such example was when former Vice-President Al Gore called Iraq a distraction from the war on terrorism that has "squandered" international support for the U.S. Mr. Gore does not realize that if terrorism is to be defeated the current Administration must continue its vigorous efforts for regime change in Iraq.

Systematic Terrorism

Saddam Hussein's regime thrives on the systematic terrorism against his neighbors, his own people, and the world.  His regime is a threat to the United States (U.S.) and world safety as he continues his relentless effort to obtain nuclear weapons of mass destruction.  In fact, the London Times reported on September 25, 2002, that Iraqi procurement agents had visited many African countries but failed in their attempts to purchase uranium according to evidence provide by the Cabinet Official's Joint Intelligence Committee (The JIC is at the heart of the British intelligence machinery). It is feared that Saddam is secretly trying to import to Iraq natural uranium where it could be enriched to form the core of a nuclear weapon.

Resorting to terrorism as an adjunct of foreign policy, Iraq has a long record of supporting terrorist groups.  For example, the formation of suicide squads to launch broad-based sabotage operations against the U.S., its friends, and interests have been called for by an editorial in the September 5, 2002 issue of Iraqi weekly Al-Iqtisadi, which is owned by Saddam Hussein's eldest son Uday.  Also, a possible series of terrorist attacks against U.S. targets globally was planned by Baghdad during the 1991 Gulf War. As a result of U.S. counter-terrorism efforts in cooperation with a number of foreign governments, these efforts were thwarted.  Below are additional examples of Iraqi involvement in terrorist activity:

A. In April 1993, when former President George H.W. Bush was visiting Kuwait, Iraqi agents had been apprehended in an aborted assassination attempt. 

B. Furthermore, having strong associations with the Osama bin Laden's terrorist network and Iraq was Ramzi Yousef the February 1993 World Trade Center (WTC) bombing mastermind. 

C. On a trip originating in Iraq, infamous terrorist Yousef flew to the U.S. using an Iraqi passport. 

D. During the 1990-1991 Iraqi occupation of Kuwait, it appears that Yousef acquired a false identity with the assistance of Iraqi authorities who adulterated his personal file.  

E. Also, it is believed that another suspect Abdul Yasin of the 1993 WTC bombing later returned to Iraq and is currently living in Baghdad.

If this is not enough evidence to convince the biggest skeptic that Iraq has been engaged in a stealth war with the U.S. since it has violated the cease-fire agreement that ended the 1991 Gulf War, there are reports of several Iraqi contacts with Osama bin Laden and his terrorist subordinates  For example, shortly prior to the September 11, 2002 airline hijackings, Osama bin Laden was in contact with Iraqi government agents according to U.S. intelligence officials.  Also, in 1998 in Kandahar, Afghanistan, bin Laden had a meeting with Farouk Hijazi, a senior Iraqi intelligence officer.  Early in 2001 in Europe, U.S. intelligence officials indicated that the ringleader of the 19 terrorists that hijacked four U.S. airliners on September 11, Mohamed Atta, reportedly met with an Iraqi intelligence officer.  This was further confirmed by Czech officials publicly who indicated that Atta and Iraqi diplomat Ahmed Khalil Ibrahim Samir Al-Ani  met in the Prague.  In Europe, Prague has long been suspected to be a hub for Iraqi intelligence by Western intelligence agencies.

Saddam More Dangerous Than Ever Before

Since the expulsion of the United Nations monitors in 1998 the Iraqi clandestine programs to build nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons of mass destruction and missiles that can deliver them have proceeded without outside intervention.  In its war against Iran and against Iraq's Kurdish opposition, the Iraqi dictator has already used chemical weapons.  Also, intercepts of Iraqi military communications during the Gulf War indicated that Saddam had authorized front-line commanders to use chemical weapons at their discretion as soon as Coalition forces began their ground offensive reported the London Sunday Times on February 3, 1991.  Furthermore, it is also believed that Iraq has enough fissile material for the production of two atomic bombs that will soon be completed.  Finally, on September 25, 2002, President Bush’s National Security Advisor Condoleeza Rice accused Hussein’s regime of sheltering members of the al-Qaida terrorist network in Baghdad and helping Osama bin Laden's operatives in developing chemical weapons.

Those who believe that Saddam is not a clear and present danger truly do not have an understanding of the issues at hand and hope that by hiding their heads in the sand, as ostriches do, that the problem will disappear.  They truly believe the ideology that man is basically good and somehow Saddam will realize that he is wrong and change from his evil ways and become a moral and righteous leader.  As long as the Saddam terrorist regime remains in power, the U.S. and its allies will remain even more vulnerable to terrorist attacks.  The skeptics fail to accept the fact that Osama bin Laden is less a threat to U.S. national security than Iraq.   Contrary to what many may say, the al-Qaida terrorist network is not sophisticated enough to be able to launch a terrorist attack like they did on September 11, without the assistance of a nation(s) state.  Covertly Saddam has been providing assistance to terrorists that want to see America and its way of life destroyed.  How can anyone doubt that if Saddam is not stopped immediately he will provide the resources and material necessary for terrorists to launch attacks on the U.S. and its allies using chemical, biological and nuclear weapons of mass destruction?  Senate Majority leader Daschle may be trying to refocus America's attention on domestic issues so the Democrats can remain in power in the Senate and win a few more seats in the House of Representatives but what is the cost?  Former Vice-President Al Gore, Senator Daschle and others can argue that “it is the economy, stupid” but how soon do they forget that one reason for the current economic downturn was the September 11th terrorist attack.  If Senator Daschle was a true leader he would have laughed at President Bush's comments and would energize the Democrats to set-forth an agenda to provide better ways to enhance the security of America from terrorist attacks instead of succumbing to special interest groups.   Instead the Majority leader is doing what all good liberals so often do when they are caught in their subterfuge, they accuse the one who has uncovered their deception and true intentions.  The Majority Leader in the coming days might be able in the short-term to win a few political victories and cause the President to rephrase his statements.  But he must realize that as more attention is taken off Saddam more time will be given to the Iraqi dictator to empower the terrorists with the weapons of mass destruction.  There is no doubt that domestic issues like the economy are important, but America cannot continue to undergo attacks like September 11.  If Saddam is not dealt with in the near future, there will be no need to focus our attention on domestic issues because the nation will be in utter chaos as terrorists such as al-Qaida will be able to inflict massive causalities with their weapons of mass destruction on the American citizenry provided by terrorist nations such as Iraq.


Back to the American Voice Institute of Public Policy Home Page